Quote:
Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It doesnt matter what happens you just dont get Allaharti apparently. I could post the study and he would then go dig up some refutation online because he isnt very original or he will change the topic. Out "sourcing" each other and all that bullshit is why internet debates fail. If you were in a real debate there would be judges and rules none of which are present here and you would have to formulate your own argument not something you can look up online.
Besides Im a cartoon. Allarharti is the real idiot because thats actually him and he actually believes what he says here.
ETA: Im not debating something esoteric here. Google the case yourself (David Remier-Joan/John-Dr. Money)and you will see what game Allaharti is playing here.
|
I've been around long enough to understand him. Point is, if you're going to put your entire point on some evidence.. then show the evidence. He can then refute it or work around it all he wants. Otherwise all this is is a "I'm right!" .. "Nu-uh I'M RIGHT!!".. and then someone goes on google dictionary to copy/paste something..
I'm going to be honest, it really sounds like no one has any real evidence to show. Both sides are ducking the issue. Making up lame excuses "Oh it's an internet debate so there is no point la la la".
Yet, you continue to go back and forth desperately trying to show how the other side is wrong.
edit: But you are debating. You are still going back and forth with him. You say you will not debate it, but you are still debating it with him.