Quote:
Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That study is called facts friend. I recall you seem to like facts but here you are arguing against facts. I think you just want to be right and have no interest in an honest discussion. Laugh all you want man if it makes you feel better that no one is agreeing with you.
|
1. Its not a fact until you link it and demonstrate a fact. Right now its known as anecdotal evidence.
"
Anecdotal evidence is evidence from anecdotes. Where only one or a few anecdotes are presented, there is a larger chance that they may be unreliable due to cherry-picked or otherwise non-representative samples of typical cases."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence
You are telling me a story so far nothing you have presented proves your story.
Secondly, I'd assume the conclusion if conducted by legitimate scientists would not be presented as you presented it. It's bad logic to say because 1 boy had this result that all people have the same results.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_composition