Quote:
Originally Posted by HippoNipple
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That is irrelevant to the argument. It doesn't matter what happens outside the US. The only argument that would support your side would be if there were American players making more in soccer than other sports.
You can't expect a society to generate all star players in sports their culture thinks is irrelevant just because their citizens can choose to leave their country, culture and family to make more money across the world. It isn't realistic or relevant.
First off, if America were fans of soccer and that is where the money in the USA went towards then we would have teams in premier leagues and Cristiano Ronaldo would be playing for a US team instead of Madrid. Citizens being fans of a sport dictate what sports get the money. In the US there is no interest in soccer so players do not make as much money.
Two, the US would generate more soccer athletes since soccer would actually be a focus instead of football/basketball/golf/baseball and you would have all stars that put current soccer athletes to shame coming out of the US.
The fact that US dominates in its top 2-3 sports and there is no way for other countries to compete isn't by accident. There isn't some secret formula for soccer that wouldn't allow the US to figure out how to create athletes for success in that sport.
|
people keep claiming soccer is a girls sport
perhaps your nation doesn't care, despite hosting the world cup in 1994.. a certainty is that the athletes that are playing football or basketball can't transition into soccer, since its too hard a sport to just step into and do well
its not because there isn't money to be made, or because its an inferior sport