Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think the programs as they are implemented are crap not the idea of social programs.
Socialism is a very very very broad term. However, the window-lickers on this forum just label socialism as one bad thing to constantly guard against. The USA is a socialist country. Just about every country is a socialist country to some degree. It's a spectrum... and I'm not talking about the autism spectrum that Santa, Raev, and Daywolf are clearly deep into.
To say I like socialism is akin to saying yes, I like humanity and its ability to better itself through cooperative effort.
I never expressed a like for communism however. Communism is not a system designed for humans who are slaves to biological function. Just like Ayn Rand's version of libertarian doesn't take into account basic humanity.
Taxation is necessary it just needs to be put to better use. Taxation is best served improving the lives of the taxpayer, meaning education, infrastructure, health, and retirement. We don't need 600 billion dollars spent on the military especially since no sovereign country is going to attack us.
If you mean price controls as is preventing price gouging by companies with monopolies or near monopolies than yes that is necessary... Take pharmaceutical companies as an example.
Social reparations... assuming you mean racial reparations etc. I think its an idiotic term. Yes the USA did a bad thing... No I'm not responsible for that bad thing.
However, the end goal of the government should be the betterment of citizens lives. The solution to years of racism and slavery plus lack of societal and economic integration is not handing out a check. This solution isn't about race though its about all the disenfranchised or impoverished, education and reduction of poverty are the best means for the upward mobility of a social class.
The idea that everyone has equal chance to climb the socioeconomic ladder is a lame myth. People who grow up in poverty have very very limited resources to improve their lives.
An often un-thought of fact: If you want to save money on good a person who has access to cash can buy goods in bulk. I poor person living paycheck to paycheck has to buy at top prices always. Being poor is expensive.
In any case Companies are not job creators. Consumers are job creators, purchasing power is what makes jobs, and removing poverty is the best way to create jobs, increase wages, and improve quality of life for every citizen across economic classes.
|
Sorry, I didn't mean to misrepresent you with regard to communism. You had previously described communism as "utopian", which lead me to believe you held a favorable view of it, but I understand you were just describing it as it defines itself.
To me, everything else you shared sounds like extraordinarily moderate/centrist positions. Not all too surprising though ^^ Blinded by ideology I think that is generally the refuge of pragmatism. Reason and idiocy flourish throughout the political spectrum, though the former tends to be less common and the latter more common at the extremes.
I know you consider Hillary on the (your?) right, but who do you consider to be to your left? Who do you consider to be more or less where you are? Are there any American politicians? How about foreign politicians/governments?