Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedmelon
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, you made a claim that raw spending doesn't have any relation to effective spending. You assumed burden of proof there. How do you know? Is the truth self-evident? Divined?
Inferred? How?
And no, I am not mistaking your argument, because you haven't made one (aside from the mutual exclusivity of raw spending and effective spending, which I asked you to explain).
Your entire schtick is generally picking apart other peoples arguments without making one yourself, like what I am doing right now. I suppose I should call you stupid and fat if I am to properly follow suit. You seem to have fun with it, so not going to fault you there, it's what we do, but I am generally interested in how you arrive at some of you conclusions.
|
Until you can prove that raw spending has a relation to effect than you must assume it doesn't.
But no I don't have fun with my 'schtick' its highly concerning t me how uneducated an illogical people are here. My 'schtick' only points out the inconsistencies so people can form better opinions... but its very very hard to break through the prideful defense of the faithful. Sometimes you need to bludgeon.
You may call me stupid the very moment I become stupid. I don't call people fat as it has no relation to an intellectual discussion.