Quote:
Originally Posted by Raev
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So you got destroyed on the facts (again) and the best you can do is a few weak ad hominems.
Looks like you need more practice posting.
|
Were the facts you listed all that was needed to support your case? I can tell you teh sky is blue but if it doesn't relate to the message you are trying to spread.... you have a problem. Your graph has some severe problems... namely that spending raw amounts doesn't have any relation to effective spending. You are trying to say welfare is bad because it doesn't help the poor become "un-poor". However, the only thing that graph MIGHT demonstrate is the current way we spend welfare monies has limited effect on the poor with the current economic controls we are operating under.
Basically, your "DESTROYED BY FACTS" equates to arguing about gravity while using chlorophyll causing grass to be green as proof.
In summary you have no fucking clue what you are talking about.
You just got destroyed by logic.