Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinned
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
NN for arguments by analogy, those are weak, and we are talking about one thing and not that other thing you just made up.
|
I'm sorry, let me try again.
Camper A, "Hey Camper C, come join my group at AC in OoT!" or "/gu I'm about to log off, anyone want to take over my camp?"
Camper C, "Sure!"
Camper A, "Welp time for me log off, good luck with AC Camper C!"
Camper B, "Hey, I was next on the list!"
Camper C, "What list?"
Camper B, "/petition dey took my merb!"
Add as much or as little time between lines as you feel is necessary.
My point is unchanged. Player agreements and server norms are player enforced. Sever Staff decisions are made on a case by case basis on all the factors involved; player statements/opinions/observations made from those decisions are
not server rules.
If the server norm is a running list for AC:OoT, then its player enforced. Why is attempting to call the "ban hammer" rather than let the community(Red:PvP, Blue:Reputation) deal with it the first option?