[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What's random about what I'm saying? Plenty of facts in there, good to know the BDA spin department continues from beyond the grave
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Okay they were told that,
THEN you went for the pixel grab rather than enforcing the rules. I see. Totally not BDA's fault. Poor BDA had no other option there (lol)
You didn't want to contest, so you weren't getting targets, so the good shit wasn't coming in.
So what did BDA ask for in terms of concessions? "It's not fair that A/A is getting everything, we want ____ _____ ____ " - please finish the sentence, I'm interested to know. Your words please, not Chest's.
No I'm not listening to a cringey 6 hour skype conference to find out the gritty details.
REALLY? BDA would have gone with another rotation? Shit who'd have guessed? lol. If there actually was one you'd only respect it for as long as you felt you couldn't do better without it.
...and again, old news but you went for a pixel grab yourselves soon after you shit canned the old one. Those guaranteed Kunark dragon pixels for BDA and Taken, yum yum. Zerg to win folks. Small guilds need not apply. Guilds wanting to learn a new encounter definitely need not apply - lets not go too casual now.
"almost universally"? I wouldn't say that. Perhaps you didn't read it. My work here isn't done, but what does a previous retirement thread have to do with your guild's greedy Kunark pixel grab and subsequent tantrum/departure?
I love it how people get rustled and get personal for no reason other than they don't have much else to say when it comes to the crunch
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Shit I think that's the longest I spent typing in a while, you're quite invested here for not being here anymore. Also you're flaring up pretty high on the autism spectrum from the last couple of posts, EQ seems to attract those types.