Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedmelon
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why then does the tree not exhibit every characteristic of the leaves if the leaves are made by he tree and creations must reflect every aspect of their creators as you argue?
|
I never said the tree was the creator nor did I say the tree must exhibit every aspect of the leaves. Maybe the tree does reflect every aspect of the leaves they just are unidentifiable to modern science. Hell can we clone a tree from a leaf? I dunno really haven't looked into it.
Quote:
|
Nihilist Santa already addressed this, but you appear to be operating with a different definition of the the word "create". What is your reasoning here? Why must nature exhibit every aspect of man?
|
If you you believe man evolved from Nature then everything man is must have been present within nature. Or are we of the belief that evolution can harvest these traits without a source? I'm not saying it's right or wrong. All I'm saying is if logic and reason exist within man. Somewhere within the process of evolution a chemical combination assembled logic and reason, and if nature assembled this then all that man does should be considered natural and working as intended by nature. Nature destroys nature, Nature destroys man, man destroys man, man destroys nature. Seems consistent with me why we bitching about man just doing what nature intends.
If we don't believe nature passed the ability to reason to man then where did it come from?