Quote:
Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I just find it interesting that it's only a douchebag move when someone takes over a camp if someone dies. Why isn't it an equally douchebag move to expect someone to relinquish a camp to you after you failed to maintain it? To me, that is equally loot-centric.
The only difference, of course, is what side of the situation you're on, now, isn't it?
While you're busy slapping down links to strawman arguments, go look up slippery slope. How long is someone expected to wait for someone to get back to a camp after dying before it becomes unclaimed? 5 mins? 30 mins? 3 hours? Now you're just making up arbitrary rules because the ones in place don't benefit you in a particular situation and anyone who disagrees is clearly a loot-centric douchebag? Convenient.
And utterly ridiculous and contrived.
|
Yeah.. look at it like this.. dude been sitting at that camp for 8-9 hours.. maybe he is unlucky.. maybe he is doing it wrong.. but its NOT greedy or douchebaggy to take a camp that is open..... 10mins or an hour or not...
For me to DIE at a camp.. and run back is my mistake.. and i OWN that mistake.. i dont blame others for moving in and taking over.. thats just the nature of the game... I'm not going to go calling people douchebags for playing EQ to the letter of this servers law.
In OOT theres been times i fell asleep and died and i came back and someone else had the camp.. i /bowed and said.. thank you sir for picking up my slack.. please allow me to get the camp back next ? And also, i have been there to take a camp when someone died... while they were sad they died they were humble and realized THEY makde the mistake and that a highly desired camp is going to get taken.. not by force.. but by the natural way of things.