Quote:
Originally Posted by NirrtiXXX
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also are some classes like Rangers and Paladins just dead classes that are worthless?
|
No, rangers and paladins are not worthless. Paladins are on a par with SKs generally speaking. Rangers are utility classes that are extremely useful when played correctly. Because it's harder than just spamming attack, most people do not play Rangers well. They make fine tanks up until about 50 or so, and remain very useful after that. Raids they are pretty much DPS, except for Weaponshield which can be a valuable tool in landing slows, tank transfer, and positioning. Rangers can also provide 'ranger clarity' by spamming liching necros or shamans with heals. They can also be useful peeling adds from casters and parking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Videri
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think rangers wish they were rogues, and paladins wish they were warriors. Then again, their versatility makes them great for small-group content. Problem is, once you hit 60, you start to run out of small-group content to do and look toward raiding, where rangers and paladins are of limited usefulness.
|
This is pretty much accurate, although I have NEVER wished I was a rogue, they are the worlds most boring class. I think warriors more often wish they were knights than the other way around, at least in non-raid situations.
If you want a test of skill and intestinal fortitude, play a ranger. If you want to be a raid hero, play one of the trinity.