Quote:
Originally Posted by Furniture
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
article is garbage
the author says about EQnext -"It was to be a resurrection of the golden days of slow burn gameplay, meaningful community, deep and expansive world making, and genuine long-term challenge."
EQNext was never going to be any of those things and only an idiot thought otherwise
|
Not sure why so angry, but ok. The point however is not quite right. When it was originally mooted as a concept, the implication was exactly that. Then it morphed fast into something else. It was such a quick turnaround I actually felt bait and switched at the time.
You can Google to see the timeline of it all. Most of the initial discussion/impression was on forums however. The very first hyperlink in the article goes to Wikipedia whose description of the game intimates the same thing.