Quote:
Originally Posted by shuklak
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
because I very well might have another regular friend join with me... what about a 3-person setup as well?
|
With the enchanter/druid combo I would add a paladin.
Now you have the ability to rez which is the main thing people were complaining about.
Paladins have pretty bad DPS but they are masters of agro control and stunlocks when combined with an enchanter. Also they can do all the pacifying for you. Blind is also a nice addition.
On the flip side (if you don't think rez is that important) you have SK. Also great at agro control. Instead of lull they have FD. Their DPS is similar to that of a Paly.
It comes down to which method of pulling suits you the most. Keep in mind that you do have an enchanter that can mez adds to it's not as if getting a few adds is a big deal.
Of the 2 I still prefer paladin and I'll explain why. A paladin can use his stuns to temporarily agro adds off the enchanter until the enchanter can get off a mez. In order for the SK to get agro off the enchanter he is either going to use disease cloud or some other form of damage. When the goal is to mez the mobs; doing direct damage or putting dots on the mob is probably the worst thing you can do. Also the paladin has access to root WITHOUT a damage component. (A sometimes necessary alternative to druid root which will break mez).
With enchanter/druid/paladin you basically have all your bases covered no matter where you go.
(EDIT: Post classic you will have problems healing the tank in the group with this setup unless your MT is a charmed pet but it's pretty much unbeatable up to level 50. That being said, 6-man groups will be more efficient come Kunark and there are always clerics available to join a group that includes a tank and a chanter.)