[QUOTE=VANVEM;2234563]
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatMice
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Dude! Read what I am typing and understand it, I have (for the sake of this discussion) conceded the fact that Detoxx, Pint, and the rest of aftermath are all sincere in what they are saying. and that they may VERY WELL have the best intentions here,but......
BUT YOU BROKE THE MOTHER FUCKING RULES! that fact hasn't changed, and in the most disrespectful way possible, if in fact you wanted to change things what they SHOULD have done is brought this very scenario up in the summit, they had the chance and if you go back and listen to it now, after the fact. it is blatantly obvious that they already had this planned. IF they had it would have been addressed, everyone of the GL's would have made damn sure they had. But by doing it this way, Pint is saying "see, I warned you"
Yep thats a great way to get people to trust in your motives, if Aftermath wants to Prove to the entire server that they mean what they are saying the Detoxx should approach the other GL's and offer a concession for stalling before a ruling comes down and ask that they all come back to the table to work out some real rules
|
Detoxx approached CSG on giving Statue loot to them. But I guess you didn't read those posts or care. We probably would have conceded State if it wasn't a repop; you know where for 4 hours we are racing to get to every mob we can. So with that mindset we needed Statue down to get to AoW.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And the rest of us believe that you (your guild) wrote yourselves a loophole in the rule that you knew you were going to intentionally break on the next repop. Which goes entirely against what you're saying.
|
What? Now you think we are whispering in Sirkens ear not tomake the rules clearer while publicly advocating for stricter rules?