Quote:
Originally Posted by Blitzers
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes Pokesan it is. I know your studies of constitutional law is epic in scale compared to the rest of us plebs, but It's a religious ceremony endorsed by the state giving those who marry more rights then those who do not. Thus Establishing favor to
<insert religion of choice> over the non religious. The historical identity of marriage the institution matters despite what you Big Gov't HAX may think.
Should we require government approved license to partake in communion? If so that is an estaishment and a prohibition on a religious ceremony.
|
it's about not establishing a state religion you boner. recognition is fine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by p99soundsok
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Oh my... where do I begin? You're honestly way out of your league in this discussion. Please do some basic research and come back later, for this is clearly above your head. No offense.
|