[AzzarTheGod]

Just a little hassling.

The victim went to the police and filed an affidavit. Big deal. Anyone can do that and exaggerate a situation to make it criminal.

I have personal experience in the court system and life experience many nerds won't see, and I'll tell you this means fuckall.

No matter how hard the prosecutor wants to prosecute, its a bluff. He will NOT go to trial on "he said, she said". As long as the perpetrator didn't offer a version of events where he touched her. Its important that he lied also, and admitted to NO GRABBING of any kind.

As long as his statement to police is also stretching the truth, you can't prosecute because both sides can't agree on anything. The #1 investigative Q that police investigators ask is rephrased watered down versions of events to try to make you feel comfortable about admitting to something. As long as you strongly buck their watered-down seemingly friendly characterization of events (I.E. "So pal, you touched her maybe with an elbow you think? Just a little incidental contact right, no big deal." And say nope, did not make contact with her, she made contact with me (lawyer speak) You're good.

His face made contact with my fist is legalese. Same with someone who strikes pedestrians, you would never use the word "hit" or "touch". You would say "my car came into contact with X" str8 from an attourney pals.