Thread: F**k washington
View Single Post
  #76  
Old 03-09-2016, 10:20 AM
maskedmelon maskedmelon is offline
Planar Protector

maskedmelon's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: not far from here
Posts: 5,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm not talking about someone taking home $10mil a month, I'm talking about the households (not individuals) that enter the $150k a year bracket getting raped under the proposed system.
I agree with the premise of your argument. Interestingly though, household income of $150k or more is only representative of the top 10%. The bottom 3/4 of households earn less than $85k.

That is a structural imbalance that ought be corrected as a matter of pragmatism.

Three steps needed to correct the imbalance:

1. Purge
2. Exponential tax brackets
3. Zero corporate income tax

None of that will happen though :/ Dems chase 2, while reps chase 3 and neither would ever pursue 1, except maybe Trump who also seems likely to pursue 2 and 3.



Trump 2016.
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>