Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedmelon
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well, I don't agree with the first statement. Maybe I am alone though.
Let's put your argument to the test. Who here has argued or would argue either of these things are true?
|
I think the miscommunication comes from, if you are against the BLM movement you are against what they were upset about... what they are upset about are unarmed non-violent black people being assaulted and then shot by the police. (mean truthfully what they are upset about is what the yowlkedas are upset about, again whites and blacks, not different at all)
I think many of the people who condemn the BLM movement do so becuse they hate the message, not the "riots" or whatever that happens during their protests. (riots and stuff that are and have been started by white instigators or the police themselves, not just really mad, teens what have no parental guidance jobs or money)
lets be clear on one hand you have blacks who no mater what they say to the police, are resisting and being violent... you have protests by blacks, that no mater what they say or do, are riots...
there is a continued insistence that no matter what it is that's good that comes from a black group or person, it cannot outweigh the bad.
when the truth is whites in the exact same position, are given a huge benefit of the doubt.