Quote:
Originally Posted by azeth
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Know what isn't classic though? 4-5 GMs managing 1k+ people, so... I don't know where you're going with this, but sometimes in the real world we make compromises.
|
You are correct, sometimes compromises should be made.
Like the fact that invulnerability agro wasn't abused on live as early on as it's being abused here? Which is why it took so long for them to nerf it? Perhaps the nerf needs to happen early for that reason? As a compromise?
When you look at posts about DA'd people keeping aggro circa 1999-2000 people were actually complaining about it, not bragging about how OP it was. It wasn't until people thought of ways to gain massive aggro before becoming invulnerable and using it to
trivialize content that the developers had to step in and put a stop to it.
You can't have it both ways. Let's be strict here but not there, let's be lenient here but not there. I'm just saying. How much easier do you want things to be for you? It just ends up making the server look bad.