Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Even an afk bard singing hymn of restoration (under 55) or cantana (55+) with a lute equipped will do more for a group than a wizard.
|
Yet in context of what I said, I'd still rather group with a wizard (paying attention) over a bard (the ones that only rolled bard to take advantage of the strafing bug for easy/fast/safe gameplay).
Someone that plays a wizard - plays a wizard, because they actually like the class and the game. So more likely to make the effort to contribute to a group and not drop off when things get a little boring or challenging.
Just like as it holds true for Cleric. Many reach cap, or near cap, and realize it's not all that great for them, then they burn out. Some people love Cleric though, I mean really really like the class, and play for no other reasons than that they just enjoy it with the good and the bad.
But when you roll something, because it's easy, or fast, or min/max, or etc, other than you just really like the class, the likelihood of you playing that class bad or burning out is significantly higher than if you just played what you wanted to play regardless of the consequences.