As a member of the FA raid alliance, I'm annoyed by such a long suspension over something that was clearly not intentional; however, a rule for this is clearly needed. You cannot reasonably expect both raids in a highly contentious race to pause 15-30 mins while we review each others' fraps and litigate if a concession is in order. So there is a a potential problem that someone will take FA or RT's word on what they have fraps on -- only to find out the whole thing was fabricated. That is what this rule is intended to prevent.
I am worried that the practical consequence of enforcing this rule however -- will be that both guilds take more of their problems to the server staff than working it amongst themselves. It is way better to hold on to your prof of a false concession for Sirken in order to get a month suspension, than to address the issue with the opposing leadership and getting a 2 week concession agreement -- which I'm sure both FA and Sirken would have preferred in this situation.
I think there needs to be stricter guild lines about false concessions. Namely, you should have to attempt to work it out with the opposing guild's leadership before petitioning.
|