A quick search came back with a pretty straight forward answer.
Within the first 4 posts of the "Camps, Defined" Thread ( found here
http://www.project1999.org/forums/showthread.php?t=2653)
this issue is addressed.
"1. Going forward, if you intend to hold or claim a camp, your group must retain presence at that camp. If you have no competition in the zone, you are more than welcome to hold as many as you like. The moment another party wants to claim a camp and you are "farming" multiple, you must decide which camp you want and forfeit the ones someone else is interested in."
Following through the posts, another thread is linked
(
http://www.project1999.org/forums/showthread.php?t=6004)
The tone of this thread suggested that there is a 50/50 split view on the definition of this particular camp.
IMO, in the first thread (Camps, defined) it seems pretty straight forward. The only way I can see a problem is, if you want to argue semantics regarding the term Room or Camp. All that aside , it was still a pretty douche move.