Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaanka
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
do u nerds even read?
|
lol this is just as bad as conspiracy theorycrafting...
Fact is eye witnesses in the real world on the floor that was struck had the building lurching to one side 3-5 minutes after contact...they said the lurching was marked, not just a little tilt, and it was scary. They used the word "entire building", meaning not just a floor was tilted, the entire superstructure was leaning like the french tower.
Building did not continue its lurching momentum, building did not fall to one side or the other a half hour later. This is going to raise some eyebrows, and no theorycrafting physics will be able to stop them from being raised.
Real world physics debunks much of the theorycrafting you posted. No rocket analysis necessary. "Objects in motion tend to stay in motion". Force on one side should progress and continue.
There should have been collateral damage from the lurching tilt if it was a natural fall. The only explanation is the superstructure was compromised, and flames in an elevator aren't gonna cut it pal theres not enough fuel in the world to fill up the entire building shaft with...also, how about explaining why the tilt didn't progress/continue?
Melt myth busted.