Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedmelon
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is why I've remained skeptical of the official narrative. The amount of logistical planning and liability insurance that goes into bringing down a high rise is staggering. To have a random application of applied force achieve the same results is almost beyond belief, but not entirely.
|
The official narrative went to shit when Fox News had eye witnesses from the floor that was struck by the plane (who escaped) describe the entire scene and one thing they explicitly stated is that the building began to lurch to one side before they were able to get down to the lower floors.
It was over 20 minutes later, building somehow does not continue to lurch, yet synchronized collapses floor by floor.
Not impossible, sure. But highly unlikely considering the initial eye witnesses had the buildings momentum lurching immediately to one side, it would have not fallen straight down had the cause of this natural momentum continued, which it did not.
No conclusion can be drawn, but being a 9/11 skeptic is healthy and demonstrates a fully functioning brain that is examining all the facts.