Quote:
Originally Posted by iruinedyourday
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also not saying the new movies are the same by the way just that they are what TOS would have evolved into naturally given the same amount of time it's taken for them to evolve into what they are now, speed. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Or at the very least, not a bastardization. |
Also these're movies, not TV shows. A TV version of STar Trek would probably be like one of hte standard dramas. You know, the transgender Captain crying on the gay islamic First Officer's shoulder and characters so deep you'll asphyxiate. And everything else a series of bakc and forth comedy and commentary on the latest flavor of ice cream.
That's not much different from TOS or TNG in all reality. But it's different from movies which tend to be faster and vapid. You won't see any scenes like hte flute in TNG which Picard sometimes used. That was a reference to "Inner Light". You don't see that in movies because the general movie going audience won't get it. Canon is less important.
TV can get away with things. Those're hte things which made STar Trek famous! A STar Trek that's famous as a movie is not the same kind of Star Trek. It's a brand of Star Trek, but it shouldn't it should be mistaken as the same thing.