Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The first list of gatekeeper mobs was considered too tough, Sirken eventually signed off on the list but by then the smaller guilds were never going to accept any of the other changes (ally for one means you ally for all, etc) BDA and specifically Anichek put a lot of time into finding a better system but it was quickly shot down, months is probably a stretch.
|
I'm not sure what people would have done but my sense from talking to my own leadership is that there was in fact appreciation for the aspect of sharing rotation slots. For example I personally supported this idea (you are one rotation entity for everything) and people in my guild's leadership I spoke with about it seemed receptive to that.
I obviously can't speak to what people would have actually done or what other guilds thought.
My personal ideal way would just be to have a 'rotation entity' require to solo kill a mob in a race to get on rotation (you can try as often as you like) and then you can bring whoever you want on future attempts. And that a guild cannot be part of multiple 'rotation entities'. People seemed receptive to this, but very up-in-arms against the other stuff with gatekeepers and kill windows that made the rotation feel like a sockfest anyway. The proposal seemed to remove the 'casual' aspect of R while retaining the limited number of targets of R.