Quote:
Originally Posted by Pan
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
To answer yours: you're a guest here. Follow the house rules. If one of them is not to exploit bugs, don't do it. Leave Dain up if it's a buggy Dain. That's their problem to solve, not yours.
|
I don't understand why we feel it's our job to solve the GMs problems. It's a really silly problem.
#1)We want them to fix buggy stuff and so we ask them to.
#2)We take matters into our own hands rather than letting GMs handle it by player made agreements that usually involve breaking server rules.
#3)GMs know they are at fault so they don't punish players for breaking server rules.
#4)Because players are killing Dain there is no game breaking urgency by him being left up, therefore, no real problem in the coding.
#5) No problem=no solution.
I'm happy coming up with all the player made agreements that are needed to make this a saner happier world, heck, if you all know me at all you know I'm 100% for them! But they can't include any party knowingly breaking server rules.
All it takes is a GM to say either "yes, Dain is allowed to be killed after a failed ring war even though we know it is an exploitation." or "We will be killing Dain after each war, do not attempt to engage him." until this bug is fixed.
One line of text from a GMs mouth solves all of this.