Quote:
Originally Posted by James_Joyce
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The use of a weapon described by its maker as "less" lethal on someone who posed no threat, you jackbooted pig.
The fact that you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism".
|
you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism" you throw the word "fascist" around and don't see anything wrong with using lethal force on non-threats is so emblematic of modern "liberalism"
Thats what a wall on an insane asylum looks like pal
side note, where do you think I support lethal force on anything???