Quote:
Originally Posted by iruinedyourday
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
that's why my pal, I rely on LAW to set the standard for how little people can be payed, not 'ideology' that results in people just paying employee's as little as possible.
|
Problem with LAW is that it creates $$$ owed instead of $$$ earned. So to offset $$$ owed companies 1 Layoff 2. Raise Prices 3. Go out of business 4. Both 1 and 2
I know companies shouldn't do those things it "morally" wrong. This is a common misconception Liberals believe they can change. Like gravity unless you change the laws of physics it's not going to happen. As for the morally wrong question, is it not just as morally wrong to force a business owner to pay more to his employees then what was agreed upon per hire? Is this private business no longer "private" but an entity of the state?
I contract for a major power company in IL. This company last year had to layoff over 300 union employees because the EPA shut down 2 coal power plants in Chicago. Union jobs and union men/women who many voted democrat. Tell me who's trying to kill union labor? Neither side cares about the American worker anymore, their is no mathematical equation to bring us out of the Economic catastrophe these politicians have created. All they are trying to do now is prolong the status quo, so when Shit hits the fan they can take their riches and be "saudi kings." While the rest of us lead a life of serfdom.
You could set the minimum wage to 100/hour and that would be the new poverty line.
It's the unaccounted for dynamic you liberals can't seem to understand. You CANT control it