Quote:
Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Even someone familiar with ASM would be missing little intricacies and intended functions of the program and what its capabilities are. lol who the fuck is going to disassemble a .dll anyway? That's ridiculous. You won't find a single sperg who is willing to do this because there will still be incomplete guesses and theories to fill in the limitations of "decompiling" (lol) a .dll file. You would still end up theorizing even if you were decent at making sense of ASM.
|
There are plenty of people who live and breath assembly code. For example, anyone who does decent penetration testing will be able to read assembly. Furthermore, there are no "intricacies and intended functions" that would be missed if someone had their hands on the actual bytecode, which can be obtained using an x86 debugger like Secrets said. Anyone with a decent level of proficiency with asm can translate the bytecode directly to assemble. It's just a matter of translating the assembly into a specific high level language, but nothing would be missing from the actual assembly code.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Its a fucking .dll, its not going to be decompiled..
|
This took me less than two minute to find.
Please just stop talking. It's obvious to anyone with actual technical knowledge that you're talking out of your ass.