http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider
Like I said -- read more, talk less. Technology is a huge obstacle in understanding whether or not the Big Bang Theory is even viable. And when you sort out the difference between plural and possessive (humanities understanding? Really?), we can delve into red-shift and why you believe you have the right to have me jump through intellectual hoops to earn my chops on a subject that is a footnote to a footnote of the original argument.
The Big Bang Theory is not the issue. The technological requirements for proving the viability of the Big Bang Theory is not the issue. The requisite time and advancement necessary to reach these technological requirements is not the issue.
The point was that we, as a species, have extremely insufficient information regarding the universe's origins in order to make any conclusive claims regarding whether or not a God was necessary or responsible. I'll save you the time of a breathy and angry response: there is nothing to disagree with.