Quote:
Originally Posted by Chanus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The point is that there are exactly as many facts indicating the existence of a god as there are facts indicating the non-existence of a god.
The disagreement is pointless and needlessly polarizing, and lately the atheist movement has become just as bigoted and unnecessarily hostile as theist movements have been in the past.
Why can't all the wonders of mathematics and physical sciences be our way of observing and understanding the work of a god? Why must there not be a god for there to be truth behind scientific explanations of life, existence, and the universe.
Why can't these concepts coexist?
Believing in Calabi-Yau space is exactly the same as believing in a deity, and we don't (yet) have the ability to disprove either.
|
The lack of proof of something does not exist is not evidence of its existence. Tell me, why do YOU think these "facts" are that proves an existence of a god?