View Single Post
  #71  
Old 01-11-2011, 03:05 AM
purist purist is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nocte [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pretty sure that's not what happened. Go read it again.
It's pretty simple, dude. You tried to posit a relationship between gun ownership and crime ("If I was a robber and I felt that everyone around me was carrying a firearm and there was a 50% chance of getting shot, I probably wouldn't want to be a robber anymore"). When I posted why I think that argument was a canard, you proceeded to insert disqualifiers ("not mentally ill individuals who may be drawn to commit violent acts") and qualifiers ("opportunistic criminals who prey on those weaker than them").

Btw, and I'm all for gun ownership, I just think the arguments that crime can be reduced by (a) restricting access to guns; or (b) making them more available are equally spurious. You only seem to think that (a) first one is.