This kind of makes me want to start talking in ooc just so I can get banned from it. Waiting on Velious for years has been incredibly boring and slowly caused me to play less. I think starting a crusade against one or more GMs might be fun, and at the very least would be entertaining for me.
Too bad I can't be a GM for Red. There'd be no more favortism and things would get done that would actually benefit the server instead of just a portion of players, who usually just bitched the loudest. I don't pvp and even I think this is some bluebie bullshit. No one who did not experience ooc how it used to be should really be the person moderating our chat channels. It's already went from NC-17 to PG-13 and really doesn't need to be forced to be G rated.
How do you justify banning someone from ooc for breaking unwritten rules? The only rule I've seen is a vague statement that can be interpreted so that almost anything said in ooc could be considered against the rules.
__________________
Cidisius - 60 Shaman (Max Alchemy)
Neefin - 60 Druid
Yawgmoth - 60 Necromancer (184 Research)
Colt - 56 Magician (184 Research)
Hannibal - 55 Monk
Urza - 53 Wizard (175 Research)
Dealer - 47 Enchanter (250 Jewelcrafting, 165 Research)
|