Quote:
Originally Posted by mgellan
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What does evolution have to do with abiogenesis? Do you need to know intimate details of what the initial state of a process is to believe that there actually is a process at work, especially when there are multiple converging but independant lines of evidence for the existence of this process?
Seems like you're conflating the two concepts to justify lack of acceptance of the current scientific consensus. Don't claim to base your opinions on science when you're making elementary mistakes.
Regards,
Mg
|
My point is that there is no scientific basis for either abiogenesis or evolution. All observations and experiments refute both ideas. First, life can only come from life so we can automatically rule out abiogenesis. Second, organisms can only produce more of what they already are so we can rule out evolution as well. Bacteria remains bacteria. Birds remain birds. Bees remain bees. Ants remain ants. Cats remain cats. Dogs remain dogs. Nothing evolves.
Only idiots believe this shit considering all observable and experimental evidence contradicts it. Then these same morons think they are the ones that actually understand science lol. No wonder this country and world are collapsing. Up has become down. Left has become right. Light has become dark. Truth has become lies. There's wayyyy to many dumb fucking people.