[Champion_Standing]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No basically your questions contained unrelated variables that you through into a question that had no meaning and only supported your statement. Unfortunately, your question didn't represent the debate or reality.



Ummmm you kind of asked for my OPINION about a situation. If you read my position early in the thread you would realize my grievance is mainly with the idiotic raid rules.



Who said anything about a lockout? I clearly said that a new guild should be able to be class R unless they kill a Class C mob which dictated by the rules would set them to Class C. Forsaken hadn't killed a Class C mob. Still don't see where I said anything about a lockout.



It seems you are doing the cherrypicking. Punitive measures are assigned to all individuals in a guild class restrictions should be assigned to guilds. Are you are saying that if a TMO member apped to Taken and can now not raid class R mobs for 30 days.
Is the majority of Forsaken the majority of TMO? If TMO instead splintered into 3-4 guilds...are all those guilds Class C? Where do you draw the line?
If Forsaken instead merged with Taken... would they be Class R or Class C? If Forsaken merged into A-Team instead of taking a new guild name would they be Class R or Class C?
You are trying to fight phantom problems. Are you pro-border fence?



Why would I care if class R is calling out other class R guilds about lockout restrictions other than entertainment value. Also, this isn't a lockout discussion.

Is it not though? Because the rules don't seem intelligent or fair.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]