[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1) In my opinion, this 1 statement is too broad. I'm sure you realize that though and are just trying to support your agenda.

Assuming we are following the current raid rules (which I find idiotic to begin with) I would fix that statement by saying you can't skirt punishments assigned to a group of people for bad behavior and you can't skip lockouts. However if you are reforming, or rebranding or splitting off from a guild, you should be allowed to switch classes to R as long as you don't kill a class C mob.

The problem with some people in this forum is they try to label Forsaken as just new TMO. That isn't the case. Forsaken does consist of many ex TMO players... but many players stayed in TMO also or rerolled red... or apped to other guilds. This is a true guild split which created an entirely new entity. New DKP, Leaders, Rules, Memberbase, guild bank, etc etc.

It is convenient for Class R to try to label them as TMO because it supports the agenda of all things TMO are evil(1) and the agenda of maximizing their (being current Class R members)loot potential(2).

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Side question:

What is the point of the class system. Isn't the point to allow guilds to get raid targets without having to fight the top 1, 2 guilds?
If so which class R guilds are allowed? Who decides this? Is the point of class R really just to limit the guilds participating to reduce the rotation size?

What this really seems like is BDA and others getting pissed that their might be more mouths to feed in the future that won't be in the guild that they approve.
That pixel lust.

^^^ More non-answer answers from Alarti. Dodging the questions. Arguing semantics. Why does this fool even bother?