Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
When debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting a claim. An argument from ignorance occurs when either a proposition is assumed to be true because it has not yet been proved false or a proposition is assumed to be false because it has not yet been proved true.[1][2] This has the effect of shifting the burden of proof to the person criticizing the proposition, but is not valid reasoning.[3]
|
Good fucking god, are you seriously trying to assign debate style rules to RnF? I think Sam might be right. You ARE insane.
All you're doing here is dodging. Man up, and speak to the issue at hand. Or perhaps, as we've all seen numerous times before, your reading comprehension skills are so poor you don't even know what's going on and simply can't formulate a coherent reaponse.
I'm betting its the latter.