Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeelot
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Everyone here seems to be confused. TMO on Red is TMO from 2010-2013. The scrubs who called themselves TMO for the past 2 years are not us, they aren't even TMO. They just grabbed our name for publicity to improve their success rate, but they still failed hard because they were just that terrible.
|
This argument makes no sense to anyone who knows how guilds grow, get sick, explode, etc.
Ok, so around 2013 a core or even a majority of TMO decided to end the run.
But some obviously stayed, or the name would not exist, nor would the guild have been able to continue (no guild bank, no roster, etc.)
You can't say "but that was not the real TMO"
That is just laughable. Some left, some stayed, those who stayed continued on their way and kept things moving more or less, but whatever internal issues contributed to the 2013 exodus has now led to phase two of the Troubles. Stop trying to turn this into some overly complicated just cause.
Predictable dominant guild breaks apart partially, some stay, new members jump on the ship, but predictable dominant guild still has issues, and falls apart. Some go to form new venture.
That's predictable guild stuff. Stop taking yourself so seriously. "The real TMO" -- lol.
I'm the real Sadre, though.