Quote:
Originally Posted by Bohab
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Not here to argue or flame anyone. The point of the post was to establish consistency. Myself and many others have experiences with Lucan where it was much like camping (tracking?) VT. When it spawns you engage regardless of who has been there longer. Phinny is a static spawn on a static timer and yet there is no regard for who has been 'camping' him longer and as far as I know it is not considered a camp. There is no consistency and that is what makes the conflict. Most of us want to work within the rules but please make them consistent.
|
I'd like for you to explain your VT delusion further. You act as if you've camped it before, but you seem to be either confused by the camping rules or you're outright lying about it being a problem.
Most people track VT with a level 1 DE cleric alt. They change their Enchanters bind point to Neriak Third Gate, and they have friends log alt healers/tanks there with them. This allows them to casually track her during the hours they're not actively raiding. When she spawns, they switch characters and wait for their force to show up since Enchanters are squishy and might have a hard time soloing her (twice so for Vessel).
That makes the VT encounter normally come down to first in force, not first to engage. If you engage without your force with no intent on killing (kiting), that's a stall and also subject to discipline.
If somebody had a force present in zone at the spawn ready to pull when VT spawns, I would say that they'll get the kill. If two forces were present, I would say that that's a lot of wasted time and the decision would come down to whoever wasn't AFK when it spawned.
So is VT campable? Sure. Are you going to make your friends and guild mates waste 5 days of their lives in Neriak Third Gate waiting for her to spawn? Jesus Christ no.