Quote:
Originally Posted by Lasher
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No reason to try to give reason why it should be changed or shouldnt be. Everyone tosses "classic" and "broken" around which ever suits them best at the moment.
Lite and azrael honestly were the main guild to use the AON army strat but now that it does not suit him.....
Lite needs to just come out and say " Empire using AON army hurts guilds chances"
I personally like to see aons have name plates only because it will make following people easier, how ever if I was the soul decider on this issue I would have no names because GG gets more flustered by no Name aons than Empire does
|
To be honest I don't think that way...
I bugreported Wizard unlimited range AoE's when I mained a wizard
I bugreported Highsun when I mained a bard
I bugreported Malosini landing on high MR targets when I was playing a Shaman.
Personally I would love nothing more than no nameplates when I play a necro, and being surrounded by 200 other skelly's would allow me to blend in and cause mass devastation. Especially in ntov on a class with 2 DA's feign death, knowledge of the zone, and max dragon faction. I'm used to fighting 200 man guilds and wiping them in velious it's something I did daily. I know exactly where i can go in that zone with faction and where I have to DA and feign to get by.
But it gives PvP an artificial feel, isn't whats best for the server, and isn't whats best for skill based pvp.