[Rahnza]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

@ Rahnza

Yet another person posting under an anonymous name (I found not a single post in the petition forum under it) complaining about their ban providing details about something that never happened. Don't be a Reiker.

I can tell you right now, the reasons you gave for your ban are things we never ban for based on alone. When I ban someone for macroquest, we're pretty damn sure you were using it, more than just some warp and targetting logs. We also don't tell players what those reasons are.. we wouldn't be very good at stopping macroquest if we told everyone the things we caught them doing would we? They would simply tell their friends not to use those features, or change them to be undetectable.

We also have a way of detecting all versions of macroquest using a specific test that is only run once in a while on high levels (mostly during raids). Being banned at level 50 with raid gear gets the point across more than being banned at level 20.

The proof we have that we don't disclose even to bannee's are foolproof server flags, if you were caught, you were using it.

Don't use it imo.

a) I wouldn't be posting from an "anonymous" account if Uthgaard hadn't forum-banned me for calling him out on fascistly deleting my posts. b) I've stated about a bazillion times that I'm Reiker, if you couldn't tell by the signature. c) No fucking clue what "complaining about their ban providing details about something that never happened. Don't be a Reiker." is supposed to mean. What about what I posted didn't happen? It's funny that you say that, and then go on and on about stuff that never happened in the case of my ban (100% guaranteed you never ran any MQ check on me, or you did and I passed and you felt like banning me anyways).

Basically, all the dumb stuff you typed in that first paragraph just turns the rest into blah blah blah.