[Nirgon]

http://www.elitegamerslounge.com/hom...?f=180&t=87498

Kefyra wrote:
Alot of people have had questions about the Rallos Zek ruleset and also in regards to the SOE view of what part of each rule entails. Apparently, on each server, the gms have enforced each rule differently. I will break down the ruleset here and ask the questions that most people have had so that can make it more clear and if it's ok with Brenlo, Ashlanne and Kytharrea, repost it onto the other site for everyone to see. The following rules are the main ones that people interpret differently.

On Rallos Zek, PvP-related Play Nice Policy situations are expected to be resolved using PvP solutions. However, Non PvP-related Play Nice Policy issues, such as training, causing intentional experience loss, bind point, zone, and portal camping, as well as other various forms of harassment, are not permitted in the PvP environment.
The main question about this rule is mostly involving "causing intentional experience loss." After talking to various servers, it seems that gms have enforced this rule differently, the main difference being in regards to attacking people while they were engaging mobs. On Tallon Zek, the gms said it was ok to attack on mobs as long as you had a raid force large enough to kill the mob that you were attacking for. For example, say your enemy is engaged on Zum Muram in Ruined City of Dranik. You would not be allowed to send a group of sks to deathtouch clerics or what not ,because a group of sks could not foreseeably fight the mob alone so obviously there to make the raid wipe out intentionally, causing xp loss. However, if you brought your whole raid force to fight for the mob, you were obviously there to pvp and have every intention to fight with the intent of killing your enemy via pvp so therefore were not intentionally causing xp loss.

2004... going back 1 year at a time... it was absolutely in place during Rallos Zek's Velious