[Nirgon]

Oh here we go someone quoted it

Source:

This link is taken directly from http://eqlive.station.sony.com/library/rz_rule_sets.jsp .

1.
If raid X had yet to engage in the encounter, the raid should find a PvP solution - easy enough, we seem to agree on this.
2. If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y who did not have adequate force to have a reasonable chance for the encounter, we will enforce the PnP - Makes since, the only reason to do so would be to cause intentional experience loss.
3. If both raid X and Y engage simultaneously, they should find a PvP solution - Seems reasonable.
4. If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y who did have adequate force to have a reasonable chance for the encounter, raid X should find a PvP solution - Violates the rules, this policy simply doesn't work. If group x is engaged w/ PvE content and then group y engages group x, whether they have a full raid force or not, the vast majority of group x will be killed by the PvE content, not by means of PvP so there is no PvP solution in this event, to intentionally do so would cause multiple experience deaths. The only acception to this is if group x engages the PvE content while already engaged in PvP with group y.
5. If raid X had engaged in the encounter and it was disrupted through PvP by group Y by training, we will enforce the PnP - How ? If group y trains group x while engaged on the PvE encounter, there is no PvP, its simply training.

I win.

Again.