Quote:
Originally Posted by Guido
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ah didn't see the two equal forces part
but the alliance combined is an equal force
so what you're really trying to say is merge lol - to have 2 same sized guilds
is that right or am I missing something here lol - with 2 equal sized guilds - this idea of sub 55 removal of pvp is possible?
|
Size isn't the entire problem. Gear, the types of members, and expertise in general aren't equal between the two. It'd be like throwing class R guilds into C, sure they might seem prepared to kill the targets, but there's a whole other layer of (petitionquest) skills that they haven't needed, nor want to face.
IF(and note that's a big if) such a level system were to be set in place I would say level 60 (because I believe that the level 60 range is only other 60's?) and large scale engagements would be outside LNS. It still doesn't really sit well with me, since sanctioned corpse camping is likely to create more tears than LNS does.
For Red, I think LNS is necessary even as a necessary evil. I think FFA in general is a flawed system, but that's an entirely different issue. I'll keep the level limit idea in mind as I watch and learn more about Red, but right now I really don't think it would end well.