It seems to me some people want to use this argument:
Nobody agrees exactly what classic is, therefore, lets add XYZ to p1999, since it's all equally valid.
That's like saying since nobody agrees exactly what liberal is, therefore, lets add conservative and libertarian to it, since it's all equally valid. Add some Ralph Nader too - is he still around?
Just because players don't agree EXACTLY, doesn't mean you can just throw in anything you want. Eventually a server has to narrow its sights on something and go with it. Some players won't like it, but that always happens. That's precisely why emulators exist: players want to get something they can't get from live. So really if players don't like what p1999 has they should try to make their own server. Or they should try to convince the creators of p1999 to change the ruleset based on a voting system.
I want to confess I LOVED playing p1999 while I was playing it, but I didn't love everyting about it. I played actively sometime around early 2010 and off/on until 2012. I never leveled past ~24 because I like(d) the lower levels. Altaholic. My point? I didn't like everyting about p1999, but I still had a lot of fun.
|