View Single Post
  #59  
Old 12-03-2010, 07:43 PM
Kavanah Kavanah is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acillatem [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Dude lol

You claim one of the reasons yer mad is because you called Efreeti in camp checks and wanna know why we came up anywayz.

Answer? Because /ooc at the time in SolB had a few people claiming you had just trained them at B&B. Sorry, but IMO that warrants at least a drive-by to see if yer still up there.

THEN you get pissed claiming we have no respect for spawns or camps etc.

But the first person to initiate ANY form of communication was YOU by ranting in /ooc about the camp JUST as we get to the top. We hadn't even DONE anything at this point other than show up at the top of the ramp and aggro one of the statics.

You wanted to be an asshole from the get-go. YOU set the tone of the encounter, we just followed suit.

Now - you said the efreeti chamber wasn't respawned, but yesterday you said:





Now that last one is important and proves my point.

Because it's already been established that the Efreeti was just killed. Anyone who has done Efreeti in the past knows you can't pacify the Efreeti. You hafta pacify the room and then pull the Efreeti FIRST. If that was the case that means the Efreeti PH would be the first respawn after the statics outside.

You are openly admitting the respawns were up outside when we got there.

So we:

a)killed the one we aggrod upon arrival
b)had our little spat in /ooc and /say
c)charmed the other static outside

Do you really think that in that time frame 1 more mob (Efreeti PH) hadn't respawned? Because that's what you are trying to convince everyone here. Your whole argument is that I'm lying about the Efreeti PH being respawned, yet you are providing all the evidence I need to show it was.

As I already said - maybe if you had taken a more political approach about it rather than mouthing off from the get-go, we wouldn't have done what we did. No doubt it was a dick move, but I'm not going to be all "rosy nice" to someone who acts like a jerk right off the bat. At that point - any semblance of me being nice and respecting your camp mid-wipe kinda get tossed out the window.

And I SERIOUSLY doubt anyone else would have done anything different. If you roll up on a person struggling with a camp and the first words out of their mouth are insults and petitions - how would you respond? "oh let us rez your poor ENC kind sir and we'll leave."

Hell no - you would have been provoked into doing exactly what I did.
Sooo... if VD wipes on a raid target, its up for grabs by any other guild during their time of recouping right? From what I've gathered via the forums, that is the general rule of thumb right? The strong get the raid target. The quick to mobilize get the raid target. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with that playstyle, I just don't see why it would be different for a mob that is duoable vs a raid target or why someone would be shocked about this. In the very least just call it a douch move which I believe Acc has already claimed it to be, whether or not you were a douche in the first place. Just seems like this situation is in line with what the rest of the server does/agrees with. /shrug.
__________________