Quote:
Originally Posted by Pint
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
unbrella is simply in here making trouble.
|
If I were in here to make trouble, I would have just said "Absolutely not" and withdrawn. Or, I'd tell you that TMO will break any agreement you come up with.
I'm honestly not interested in GMs being anymore involved than they already are or coming up with new rules that we're bound to indefinitely, hence our position. Sometimes circumstances change and you need to be flexible. At the rate things have been, Dolj will break the agreement and TMO will end up getting disbanded for it.
Also, as your rules are written, there is nothing stopping me (or any other guild, for that matter) from inviting a few people from Class-R, making a couple more officers and calling myself a whole new guild and breaking it free and clear. Or, create an alt guild to break it.
And, if you make it so that every guild has to oblige to the agreement, it's no longer a player agreement it's a staff-mandate. If a new guild were to form with a bunch of randoms from a few other guilds, let's call it <Transatlantic>, and kill an OoA, you're back up shit's creek with your agreement. Or, if <Transatlantic> were a legit new guild and wanted to come to sky to kill an OoA, they'd have to request to be put in rotation at the end of the list (if we went the rotation route) or have to be guaranteed a sky day/time for YNYD.
I'm interested in more nobles, you're interested in more nobles. Until you can come up with something better, you'll have to take me at my word - which so far has a pretty strong credibility when it comes to sky - there are several guild leaders that can confirm that. Like I said earlier, you should shift the focus away from TMO who never broke the agreement to begin with.
Also, thanks for the kind word, Jpet.