Quote:
|
I love it when a fellow warriors talks about how he or she does "decent dps"....compared to what, retard? (Not directed at anyone above btw)
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't warriors the baseline for melee dps? Maybe things aren't balanced as I remember but if a warrior, sk, pal, monk, rogue, ranger and bard were all wielding the same damage/delay weapons(obviously taking in account pal/sk inability to dw and bard/rogue's inability to wield 2 handers) would the results end up something like this?
1. rogue (dual wield/backstab/double attack)
2. monk (dual wield/double attack/flying kick)
3. war (dual wield/double attack/kick or slam)
4. ranger (dual wield/double attack/kick)
5. pal/sk (double attack)
6. bard (dual wield)
I guess this theory does not account for the difference in gear of course. Also it may be possible that monks top rogues for dps in the server's current state (I have done little research to this fact on this server but I remember this from live). Does anyone have any data to confirm/deny this statement?
Also are pal/sk/war defense and offense skills capped at the same level right now? I would like to see where all the melee classes stand in that respect.