Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Or maybe... The pulls people do are so ridiculous that there are so many things which could possibly go wrong and result in training the other guild(s) present that *MAYBE* we shouldn't try those tactics. *MAYBE* training the entire zone spawn in Hate, Fear, VP, Naggys Lair, Permafrost... Is something that should have high risk associated with it, not simply shrugged off as "it is the way those encounters are".
Make someone wiping you with their botched train in Hate or Fear or on classic Dragons a 4 week suspension. You will see guilds be a lot more careful or come up with a new strategy real quick.
Would love to see some classic crawls, not herpderp trains.
|
For VP, trains are currently the most workable standard with the highest expected payoff. The only other standard that would require less intervention by the staff would be a return to a completely FFA VP which many in Class C would welcome. Forcing some kind of classic standard on VP kills would result in way more headache and non-classic coding.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loke
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
guilds would be punished/rewarded more for being suspended/getting their competition suspended, making rule lawyering much more important to a guilds overall success.
|
Excellent point. Any rules suggestions must be constructed to eliminate or reduce the incentive to play lawyerquest.